Explainable Temporal Attribution for Time-Series-Based Quality Prediction in Injection Molding

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 28, 2026
Yulin Wang Elke Deckers Konstantinos Gryllias

Abstract

Time-series sensor signals collected during injection molding
contain rich information about process dynamics and final
part quality. However, quality prediction models based on
high-dimensional temporal signals are often difficult to in
terpret, and direct attribution in the original signal domain
may produce unstable explanations. This paper proposes an
explainable temporal attribution framework for time-series
based quality prediction in injection molding. The framework
first learns compact latent representations of multivariate pro
cess signals using a one-dimensional convolutional autoen
coder, and then trains a latent-space prediction model for
defect classification or dimensional quality regression. To re
cover process-level interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlana
tions (SHAP) are computed in the latent space and propagated
back to the original temporal signal domain through the de
coder Jacobian. The proposed framework is evaluated on two
injection molding datasets. The results show that the learned
latent representations preserve dominant temporal process
characteristics and provide useful information for downstream
quality prediction. The temporal attribution results reveal that
pressure-related signals and the filling-to-packing transition
are especially important for quality prediction, while phase
aware analysis indicates that packing and cooling stages play
dominant roles in sink mark prediction. Robustness analysis
further demonstrates that the decoder-based temporal attribu
tion framework provides more stable and consistent explana
tions than direct SHAP analysis in the original signal domain.
The proposed method offers an interpretable way to connect
latent predictive features with physically meaningful mold
ing process dynamics, supporting process understanding and
quality-related decision making.

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Deckers, E., & Gryllias, K. (2026). Explainable Temporal Attribution for Time-Series-Based Quality Prediction in Injection Molding. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2026.v18i1.4829
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Quality Prediction, Injection Molding, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Time-Series Analysis

References
Ara´ujo, C., Pereira, D., Dias, D., Marques, R., & Cruz, S.
(2023). In-cavity pressure measurements for failure
diagnosis in the injection moulding process and correlation
with numerical simulation. The International Journal
of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 126(1),
291–300. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11100-1
Bento, J., Saleiro, P., Cruz, A. F., Figueiredo, M. A. T., &
Bizarro, P. (2021). TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent
Models through Sequence Perturbations. In Proceedings
of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge
Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2565–2573). doi:
10.1145/3447548.3467166
Chen, X., & Gao, F. (2003). A study of packing profile on
injection molded part quality. Materials Science and
Engineering: A, 358(1), 205–213. doi: 10.1016/S0921-
5093(03)00290-9
Deng, X., Xiang, W., Lin, W., Zheng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025).
Few-shot injection molding quality prediction method
integrating deep transfer and multi-task learning. The
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,
141(1), 609–632. doi: 10.1007/s00170-025-
16651-z
Ding,W., Ali, H., Gao, K., Zhang, Z., & Gao, F. (2025). Novel
deep learning based soft sensor feature extraction for
part weight prediction in injection molding processes.
Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 78, 58–68. doi:
10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.11.011
Finkeldey, F., Volke, J., Zarges, J.-C., Heim, H.-P., &
Wiederkehr, P. (2020). Learning quality characteristics
for plastic injection molding processes using a
combination of simulated and measured data. Journal
of Manufacturing Processes, 60, 134–143. doi:
10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.028
Gaspar-Cunha, A., Melo, J., Marques, T., & Pontes, A. (2025).
A Review on Injection Molding: Conformal Cooling
Channels, Modelling, Surrogate Models and Multi-
Objective Optimization. Polymers, 17(7), 919. doi:
10.3390/polym17070919
Gim, J., & Rhee, B. (2021). Novel Analysis Methodology
of Cavity Pressure Profiles in Injection-Molding Processes
Using Interpretation of Machine Learning Model.
Polymers, 13(19), 3297. doi: 10.3390/polym13193297
Gordon, G., Kazmer, D. O., Tang, X., Fan, Z., & Gao, R. X.
(2015). Quality control using a multivariate injection
molding sensor. The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 78(9), 1381–1391. doi:
10.1007/s00170-014-6706-6
Gruber, D. P., Berger, G., Pacher, G., & Friesenbichler, W.
(2011). Novel approach to the measurement of the
visual perceptibility of sink marks on injection molding
parts. Polymer Testing, 30(6), 651–656. doi:
10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.013
Hong, J., Hong, Y., Baek, J.-W., Kang, S.-W., Hong, J.,
Hong, Y., . . . Kang, S.-W. (2025). Enhancing the
Product Quality of the Injection Process Using eXplainable
Artificial Intelligence. Processes, 13(3). doi:
10.3390/pr13030912
Kariminejad, M., Tormey, D., Huq, S., Morrison, J., &
McAfee, M. (2021). Ultrasound Sensors for Process
Monitoring in Injection Moulding. Sensors, 21(15),
5193. doi: 10.3390/s21155193
Ke, K.-C., Wang, J.-C., & Nian, S.-C. (2024). Data-driven
quality prediction in injection molding: An autoencoder
and machine learning approach. Polymer Engineering
& Science, 64(9), 4520–4538. doi: 10.1002/pen.26866
Kechris, C., Dan, J., & Atienza, D. (2025). Time series
saliency maps: Explaining models across multiple domains.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13100v3.
Kurt, M., Saban Kamber, O., Kaynak, Y., Atakok, G., & Girit,
O. (2009). Experimental investigation of plastic injection
molding: Assessment of the effects of cavity
pressure and mold temperature on the quality of the
final products. Materials & Design, 30(8), 3217–3224.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.004
Liew, K.-F., Peng, H.-S., Huang, P.-W., & Su, W.-J. (2022).
Injection Barrel/Nozzle/Mold-Cavity Scientific Real-
Time Sensing and Molding Quality Monitoring for Different
Polymer-Material Processes. Sensors, 22(13),
4792. doi: 10.3390/s22134792
Muaz, M., Sajid, S., Schulze, T., Liu, C., Klasen, N., &
Drescher, B. (2025). Explainable AI for correct root
cause analysis of product quality in injection moulding.
Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 145, 371–380. doi:
10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.114
P´arizs, R. D., T¨or¨ok, D., Ageyeva, T., & Kov´acs, J. G. (2022).
Machine Learning in Injection Molding: An Industry
4.0 Method of Quality Prediction. Sensors, 22(7), 2704.
doi: 10.3390/s22072704
P´arizs, R. D., T¨or¨ok, D., Ageyeva, T., & Kov´acs, J. G. (2023).
Multiple In-Mold Sensors for Quality and Process Control
in Injection Molding. Sensors, 23(3), 1735. doi:
10.3390/s23031735
Presciuttini, A., Cantini, A., Cramer, S., Huber, M., Wolfschl
¨ager, D., Schmitt, R. H., & Portioli-Staudacher, A.
(2025). An Integrated Framework for Predictive Quality
in Injection Molding: Combining Explainable AI
and Time Series Analysis in a German Industry Case
Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 59(10), 1677–1682. doi:
10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.282
Speranza, V., Vietri, U., & Pantani, R. (2013). Monitoring of
Injection Moulding of Thermoplastics: Adopting Pressure
Transducers to Estimate the Solidification History
and the Shrinkage of Moulded Parts. Strojniˇski vestnik –
Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 59(11), 677–682.
doi: 10.5545/sv-jme.2013.1000
Wang, J.-C., Chang, C.-T., & Ke, K.-C. (2026). Data-driven
representation learning and stability validation for multiquality
prediction in smart injection molding. The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
doi: 10.1007/s00170-026-17655-z
Wang, Q., Zhao, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, P., Wang, X., Yang,
C., . . . Wu, Z. (2021). Research on Quality Characterization
Method of Micro-Injection Products Based
on Cavity Pressure. Polymers, 13(16), 2755. doi:
10.3390/polym13162755
Yan, P., Abdulkadir, A., Aguzzi, G., Schatte, G. A., Grewe,
B. F., & Stadelmann, T. (2024). Automated process
monitoring in injection molding via representation learning
and setpoint regression. In 2024 11th IEEE Swiss
Conference on Data Science (SDS) (pp. 138–145). doi:
10.1109/SDS60720.2024.00027
Zhao, N.-Y., Liu, J.-F., Su, M.-Y., & Xu, Z.-B. (2024).
Measurement techniques in injection molding: A comprehensive
review of machine status detection, molten
resin flow state characterization, and component quality
adjustment. Measurement, 226, 114163. doi:
10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114163
Section
Technical Research Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>