Uncertainty-Aware Model-Constrained Neural Digital Twins for Real-Time Forecast, Calibration, and Control of Aeroelastic Airfoils
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Current structural health monitoring (SHM) in aeroelastic systems struggles with recovering unobservable states from limited sensor data, lacks quantified prediction confidence, and exhibits brittleness under off-nominal conditions. To address these operational gaps, this paper presents a physics aware neural digital twin (DT) designed for real-time, adaptive monitoring of aerospace structures. The proposed DT framework combines two neural networks for stabilizing control and forward prediction while using Bayesian filtering for nonlinear state estimation and uncertainty quantification. We train the controller using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) [1], an actor-critic method, and the forward model using the mcTangent loss [2]. We use Bayesian particle filter ing to infer the state and provide uncertainty quantification for assurance. The DT then provides the control input to the physical twin using the mean state estimate. Using only pitch angle measurements from a nonlinear airfoil model, the DT recovers full system state, stabilizes the structure rapidly, and provides uncertainty quantification (UQ) with all predictions. Finally, we compare the results to a more traditional approach of ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and model predictive control (MPC) and the base ODE model rather than the surrogate, which preforms worse due to worse early estimation of the hidden state. We also discuss the architecture’s transferability to broader digital twin applications across aerospace platforms.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Digital Twins, Machine Learning
Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization
algorithms, 2017.
[2] Hai V. Nguyen and Tan Bui-Thanh. A modelconstrained
tangent slope learning approach for dynamical
systems. International Journal of Computational
Fluid Dynamics, 36(7):655–685, August 2022.
[3] National Academy of Engineering and National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions
for Digital Twins. The National Academies Press,
Washington, DC, 2024.
[4] Adam Thelen, Xiaoge Zhang, Olga Fink, Yan Lu,
Sayan Ghosh, Byeng D. Youn, Michael D. Todd,
Sankaran Mahadevan, Chao Hu, and Zhen Hu. A comprehensive
review of digital twin – part 1: Modeling
and twinning enabling technologies, 2022.
[5] Prasad Talasila, Dmitri Tcherniak, Anders M.D.
Jensen, Swarup Mahato, Jakob V. Medom, Martin
D. Ulriksen, Giuseppe Abbiati, A. Sch¨orghofer-
Queiroz, Peter G. Larsen, and Lars Damkilde. A
digital twin platform for structural health monitoring.
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,
50:100086, 2026.
[6] Marcel Menner, Ankush Chakrabarty, Karl Berntorp,
and Stefano Di Cairano. Learning optimization-based
control policies directly from digital twin simulations.
In 2022 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and
Applications (CCTA), pages 895–900, 2022.
[7] T.G. Ritto and F.A. Rochinha. Digital twin, physicsbased
model, and machine learning applied to damage
detection in structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing, 155:107614, 2021.
[8] Raisa Bentay Hossain, Farid Ahmed, Kazuma
Kobayashi, Seid Koric, Diab Abueidda, and Syed Bahauddin
Alam. Virtual sensing-enabled digital twin
framework for real-time monitoring of nuclear systems
leveraging deep neural operators, 2024.
[9] Joelle W.Y. Chia, Wim J.C. Verhagen, Jose M. Silva,
and Ivan S. Cole. A review and outlook of airframe
digital twins for structural prognostics and health management
in the aviation industry. Journal of Manufacturing
Systems, 77:398–417, 2024.
[10] Eric J. Tuegel, Anthony R. Ingraffea, Thomas G.
Eason, and S. Michael Spottswood. Reengineering
aircraft structural life prediction using a digital
twin. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering,
2011(1):154798, 2011.
[11] Xiaonan Lai, Liangliang Yang, Xiwang He, Yong
Pang, Xueguan Song, andWei Sun. Digital twin-based structural health monitoring by combining measurement
and computational data: An aircraft wing example.
Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 69:76–90,
2023.
[12] Jiaqi Xu, Dingqiang Dai, Xuan Zhou, Marco Giglio,
Claudio Sbarufatti, and Leiting Dong. Structural
damage diagnosis and prognosis with fleet digital
twin considering similarity of individual structural
features. Aerospace Science and Technology,
168:110983, 2026.
[13] M.G. Kapteyn, D.J. Knezevic, D.B.P. Huynh, M. Tran,
and K.E. Willcox. Data-driven physics-based digital
twins via a library of component-based reduced-order
models. International Journal for Numerical Methods
in Engineering, 123(13):2986–3003, 2022.
[14] Sebastian Thrun, Wolfram Burgard, and Dieter Fox.
Probabilistic robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.,
2005.
[15] Yuting Bai, Bin Yan, Chenguang Zhou, Tingli Su, and
Xuebo Jin. State of art on state estimation: Kalman
filter driven by machine learning. Annual Reviews in
Control, 56:100909, 2023.
[16] Zheng-Meng Zhai, Mohammadamin Moradi, Bryan
Glaz, Mulugeta Haile, and Ying-Cheng Lai. Machinelearning
parameter tracking with partial state observation.
Phys. Rev. Res., 6:013196, Feb 2024.
[17] Negar Asadi and Seyede Fatemeh Ghoreishi. Bayesian
state estimation in partially-observed dynamic multidisciplinary
systems. Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering,
Volume 1 - 2022, 2022.
[18] Lorenzo Schena, Pedro A. Marques, Romain Poletti,
Samuel Ahizi, Jan Van den Berghe, and Miguel A.
Mendez. Reinforcement twinning: From digital twins
to model-based reinforcement learning. Journal of
Computational Science, 82:102421, 2024.
[19] Ling-Wei Kong, Yang Weng, Bryan Glaz, Mulugeta
Haile, and Ying-Cheng Lai. Digital twins of nonlinear
dynamical systems, 2022.
[20] T. Hielscher, S. Khalil, N. Virgona, and S.A. Hadigheh.
A neural network based digital twin model for the
structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete
bridges. Structures, 57:105248, 2023.
[21] R. E. Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and
prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering,
82(1):35–45, 03 1960.
[22] Ian Grooms. A comparison of nonlinear extensions
to the ensemble kalman filter: Gaussian anamorphosis
and two-step ensemble filters. Computational Geosciences,
26(3):633–650, March 2022.
[23] M.S. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, and
T. Clapp. A tutorial on particle filters for online
nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE
Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2):174–188,
2002.
[24] Andrew McClellan, Joseph Lorenzetti, Marco Pavone,
and Charbel Farhat. A physics-based digital twin
for model predictive control of autonomous unmanned
aerial vehicle landing. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences, 380(2229):20210204, 06 2022.
[25] Yi-Ping Chen, Vispi Karkaria, Ying-Kuan Tsai, Faith
Rolark, Daniel Quispe, Robert X. Gao, Jian Cao, and
Wei Chen. Real-time decision-making for digital twin
in additive manufacturing with model predictive control
using time-series deep neural networks. Journal of
Manufacturing Systems, 80:412–424, 2025.
[26] Matthew J. Tenny, James B. Rawlings, and Stephen J.
Wright. Closed-loop behavior of nonlinear model predictive
control. AIChE Journal, 50(9):2142–2154,
2004.
[27] Rolf Findeisen and Frank Allg¨ower. Computational
delay in nonlinear model predictive control. IFAC Proceedings
Volumes, 37(1):427–432, 2004. 7th International
Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical
Processes (ADCHEM 2003), Hong-Kong, 11-14 January
2004.
[28] Keum W. Lee and Sahjendra N. Singh. Global Robust
Control of an Aeroelastic System Using Output Feedback.
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,
30(1):271–275, 2007.
[29] Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt,
and David Duvenaud. Neural ordinary differential
equations, 2019.
[30] Jeonghwan Ko, Thomas W. Strganac, and Andrew J.
Kurdila. Stability and control of a structurally nonlinear
aeroelastic system. Journal of Guidance, Control,
and Dynamics, 21(5):718–725, 1998.
[31] Carlos J. G. Rojas, Andreas Dengel, and Mateus Dias
Ribeiro. Reduced-order model for fluid flows via neural
ordinary differential equations, 2021.
[32] Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method
for stochastic optimization, 2017.
[33] James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins,
Matthew James Johnson, Yash Katariya, Chris Leary,
Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake
VanderPlas, SkyeWanderman-Milne, and Qiao Zhang.
JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy
programs, 2018.
[34] Joel A E Andersson, Joris Gillis, Greg Horn, James B
Rawlings, and Moritz Diehl. CasADi – A software
framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal
control. Mathematical Programming Computation,
11(1):1–36, 2019.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.