Guidance for the Certification and Continued Airworthiness of PHM System for Aviation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
One of the barriers for the wider use of Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) systems in regular usage in commercial aviation has been the need to certify all components and functions related to PHM. Because PHM systems are not entirely like other systems on an aircraft, little guidance has been provided by the authorities or standards development organizations (SDO) in regards to such certification. Additionally, there is a lack of guidance for the continued airworthiness of the PHM system, i.e., rules for monitoring, maintaining, and updating them. We are not even touching on the ever sensitive topic of the need for significant monetary investment in the development, testing, manufacture, and operations of the PHM system, which OEMs are loath to do. However, there is some good news in the offing. One piece of this complex puzzle has recently been solved and in this paper, we will review and report on three events of significant progress which will help with the development and deployment of PHM systems for commercial aircraft.
The MPIG (the Maintenance Programs Industry Group, which develops the maintenance guidance commercial aircraft – MSG) published guidance on how a PHM task can replace an approved scheduled maintenance. Next, the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) published an advisory circular laying out the requirements for what an end-to-end PHM system needs to comply with to be deployed on aircraft certified in the US. But even more critically, the SAE’s E-32 (Propulsion Health Management) technical committee published a short guidance on how to certify a PHM system – and any required ground support equipment – on an engine. The HM-1 (Integrated Vehicle Health Management) committee later updated this guidance to include the entire vehicle. With these three recent developments, one part of getting PHM systems on aircraft is made easier. Other challenges – such as justifying them financially – still remain, but it will be harder to argue that the certification and continued airworthiness authorities are not in favor of employing PHM systems in commercial aviation.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
AHM, IVHM, PHM, Aerospace applications, Certification, Continued Airworthiness, FAA, MSG
Air Transport Association (ATA, 1968). Maintenance Evaluation and Program Development (MSG-1), July 1968.
Bailey, J., (2025). Top 10: The most profitable airlines in the world, AeroTime, May 2025.
Barrera, D,L., (2022). Aircraft Maintenance Programs, Cham, Switzerland: Springer-Verlag, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90263-6
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA, 2025), International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board,
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/aircraftproducts/international-maintenance-review-boardpolicy-board-IMRBPB. Retrieved July 2025. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2003), Airworthiness approval of rotorcraft health usage monitoring systems (HUMS), AC 29 MG15. February 2003.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2004), Powerplant instruments, FAR 25.1305(D)(3), July 2004. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2022). Operational Authorization of Integrated Aircraft Health Management System, AC 43-218, July 2022.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2024). Airworthiness Certification of Aircraft, Order 8130.2K, August 2024.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2025A). A Brief History of the FAA, https://www.faa.gov/about/history/ brief_history/, Retrieved July 2025.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2025B). A Historical Chronology, 1926-1996, https://www.faa.gov/about/ history/chronolog_history, Retrieved July 2025.
International Air Transport Association (IATA, 2025), Airline Maintenance Cost Executive Commentary: FY2023 Data, January 2025.
International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board (IMRBPB, 2018). Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM) integration in MSG-3, Issue Paper (IP 180), April 2018.
International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board (IMRBPB, 2021), Amendment to IP180 to clarify system features to be certified by type certification staff, Issue Paper (IP 197), July 2021.
International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board (IMRBPB, 2023). Level 3 Analysis – AHM Effectiveness Determination, Issue Paper (IP 211), July 2023.
Jennions, I., ed., (2012). Integrated Vehicle Health Management: Business Case Theory and Practice,
Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2012. Malere, J., and Santos, L., (2013). Challenges for Costs and
Benefits Evaluation of IVHM Systems, SAE Int. J. Aerosp., September 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/ 2013-01-2183.
McCollom, N. N. and Brown, E.R., (2011). PHM on the F35 fighter, Proceeding 2011 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Denver, CO, USA, June 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICPHM.2011.6024363.
Nowlan, S.F., and Heap, H.F., (1978). “Reliability Centered Maintenance,” Los Altos, CA: Dolby Access Press, December 1978.
Piotrowski, D., (2019). SHM in Civil Aviation: Moving the Industry Forward, IWSHM 2019, Stanford, CA, USA, September 2019.
Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, (RTCA, 2011), Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, DO-178C, December 2011.
Rajamani, R., (2020). Unsettled Issues Concerning Maintenance Credits and IVHM Systems, EPR2020006, SAE International, May 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4271/EPR2020006
SAE International, (SAE, 2008). AISC-SHM: Aerospace Industry Steering Committee on Structural Health Monitoring, Est. 2008.
SAE International, (SAE. 1975). E-32: Aerospace Propulsion Systems Health Management, Est. 1975.
SAE International, (SAE, 2010B). IVHM-SG: Integrated Vehicle Health Management Steering Group, Est. 2010.
SAE International, (SAE, 2010A). HM-1: Integrated Vehicle Health Management Committee, Est. 2010.
SAE International, (SAE, 2020). Diagnostic and Prognostic Metrics for Aerospace Propulsion Health Management
Systems, AIR7999, October 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4271/AIR7999.
SAE International, (SAE, 2021). Determination of Costs and Benefits from Implementing an Integrated Vehicle Health Management System, ARP6275A, February 2021.
SAE International (SAE 2023A), Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, ARP4754B, December 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271 /ARP4754B.
SAE International (SAE 2023B), Guidelines for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Aircraft, Systems, and Equipment, ARP4761A, Revised December 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/
ARP4761A.
SAE International, (SAE, 2024). Establishing Software Assurance Levels for Engine Health Management Systems Utilized for Maintenance Credit, ARP5987A, April 2024.
SAE International, (SAE, 2025). Utilizing Integrated Vehicle Health Management Systems for Airworthiness Credit, ARP7122, May 2025.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.