Digital Twin-based IVHM for Predictive Maintenance

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2025
Salvatore Norcaro Roberta Cumbo Leonardo Mangeruca Luigi Di Guglielmo Alessandro Ulisse

Abstract

This paper proposes a Digital Twin-based Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) approach to enable predictive maintenance in aviation and aerospace industry. Predictive maintenance enables the identification of potential failure before they occur, improving operational efficiency, safety, and cost management by reducing downtown and optimizing maintenance scheduling. However, conventional approaches face three key challenges: lack of reliable run-to-failure data, uncertainties in system behavior and predictions, and fragmented processes between design and maintenance activities. This article introduces the concept of Authoritative Hybrid as-operated Digital Twin to overcome the current limitations. The proposed solution brings three main technical advancements: the integration of physics-informed Artificial Intelligence (AI) architecture reusing design artifacts into an IVHM system; the implementation of a comprehensive Validation, Verification, and Accreditation (VVA) process to support certification; and the enhancement of Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) methods to ensure digital continuity across the different processes. This supports the development of advanced predictive maintenance capabilities, aligned with the vision of Type III IVHM systems, ultimately enabling more resilient, informed, and cost-effective operations in aerospace domain.

How to Cite

Norcaro, S., Cumbo, R., Mangeruca, L., Di Guglielmo, L., & Ulisse, A. (2025). Digital Twin-based IVHM for Predictive Maintenance. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2025.v17i1.4343
Abstract 1 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Digital Twin, Predictive Maintenance, IVHM, Verification & Validation

References
Adhikari, P., Rao, H., and Buderath, M. (2018, October). Machine Learning based Data Driven Diagnostics and Prognostics Framework for Aircraft Predictive Maintenance. 10th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Dresden, Germany.
ANSYS, Hybrid Analytics: A Tool Set for Building Hybrid Digital Twins (2024), https://www.ansys.com/blog/hybrid-analytics-toolset-for-digital-twins , accessed 26 May 2025.
ATA MSG-3 (2022), Volume I ñ Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development, Revision 2022.1, Air Transport Association of America.
EASA AMC 29.1465. Vibration health monitoring.
EASA CM-S-014 Issue 01(2020). Modelling & Simulation ñ CS-25 Structural Certification Specifications.
FAA AC 29-2C MG15. Airworthiness Approval of Rotorcraft Health Usage Monitoring Systems (HUMS).
Ferrari, A., & Willcox, K. (2024). Digital twins in mechanical and aerospace engineering. Nature Computational Science, 4(3), 178-183.
Hartwell, A., Montana, F., Jacobs, W., Kadirkamanathan, V., Ameri, N., & Mills, A. R. (2024). Distributed digital twins for health monitoring: resource constrained aero-engine fleet management. The Aeronautical Journal, 128(1325), 1556-1575.
IMRBPB IP 180. (2018) Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM) integration in MSG-3. International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board.
IMRBPB IP 197. (2021) Amendment to IP180 to clarify system features to be certified by type certification staff. International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board.
Li, H., Zhang, Z., Li, T., & Si, X. (2024). A review on physics-informed data-driven remaining useful life prediction: Challenges and opportunities. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 209, 111120.
Liao, L., & Kˆttig, F. (2014). Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 63(1), 191-207.
Raissi M., Perdikaris P., Karniadakis G.E., Physicsinformed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019) 686ñ707.
Michael J., Pfeiffer J., Rumpe B., & Wortmann A. (2022, May). Integration challenges for digital twin systemsof-systems. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and Software Ecosystems (pp. 9- 12).
MIL-STD-3022 (2021). Documentation of Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) for Models and Simulations.
Nascimento, R. G., & Viana, F. A. (2019). Fleet prognosis with physics-informed recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.05512.
Rhein J. , Bimbi M. , Miraglia G. & Holzapfel F. (2024). Simulation-Driven Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of Flight Control System Architectures.
RTCA/DO-178 Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, 2011, RTCA, Inc.
RTCA/DO-254 Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware, 2000, RTCA, Inc.
SAE ARP 4754A. Issued 2010-12. Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems.
SAE ARP 4761. Issued 1996-01. Guidelines and Methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment.
SAE ARP5783. Issued 2018-03. Health and Usage Monitoring Metrics Monitoring the Monitor.
SAE ARP6803. Issued 2016-03. IVHM Concepts, Technology and Implementation Overview.
SAE ARP6886. Issued 2019-03. Guidelines for Writing IVHM Requirements for Aerospace Systems
SAE ARP6887. Issued 2024-09. Validation and Verification of Integrated Vehicle Health Management Systems.
SAE ARP6983. WIP. Process Standard for Development and Certification/Approval of Aeronautical SafetyRelated Products Implementing AI.
Shahin, K. I., & Lazarova-Molnar, S. (2024). Digital Twins in Prognostics and Health Management: A Review of Diagnostic, Remaining Useful Life, and Predictive Maintenance Applications. In 2024 8th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS) (pp. 720-729). IEEE.
Sikorska, J. Z., Hodkiewicz, M., & Ma, L. (2011). Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 25(5), 1803-1836.
Simon, D. (2001). Kalman filtering. Embedded systems programming, 14(6), 72-79.
Thelen, A., Zhang, X., Fink, O., Lu, Y., Ghosh, S., Youn, B. D., Todd, M. D., Mahadevan, S., Hu, C. & Hu, Z. (2022). A comprehensive review of digital twinópart 1: modeling and twinning enabling technologies. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65(12), 354.
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H. & He, Q. (2020). A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(1), 43-76.
Section
Industry Experience Papers