Maintenance, Engineering, and Operational Decision-Making Metrics Derived from Simple Maintenance and Aircraft Datasets
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Using in-service maintenance data, it is possible to predict and forecast the propulsion system contribution to aircraft and fleet level unavailability and to identify sub-system degraders of overall engine reliability. While more complex means of assessing reliability exist, increased layers of complexity can lead to increasing difficulty when used to convince a military commander or fleet manager of the appropriate action to take. Furthermore, increased complexity increases the time required to produce, to analyze, and to assess results of reliability assessments. In a time-critical situation, when faced with the need for an immediate maintenance or engineering decision, the best information is that which is the simplest and easiest to understand, quickest to produce, and fastest to apply. In this work, a minimum list of data requirements will be developed with an associated means of analyzing these data to produce meaningful indicators to predict and to forecast unavailability and mission abort rates that can be used to plan for deployed or sustained operations. Analysis of the same data set can produce a prioritized listing of sub-system reliability degraders to drive engineering decisions for component improvement. The Royal Canadian Air Force’s CT114 Tutor aircraft will be the basis for analysis demonstrating that sophisticated sensors and data systems are not required to be able to produce meaningful data suitable for significant fleet level decisions. Statistical methods and appropriate data filtering were applied to the engine system to derive rates for overall mission aborts, aircraft unavailability and aircraft unreliability for the top sub-system degraders. Conclusions drawn include that this information, if calculated correctly, can provide decision makers with the critical information required to make significant fleet wide decisions. Recommendations and methodology are presented that are applicable to any military or civil aircraft fleet at the sub-system, aircraft, and fleet level.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Fleet Reliability, Operations and Maintenance, Data Analysis
DND. (n.d.). A-GA-135-001/AA-001 Flight Safety for the Canadian Armed Forces. Department of National Defence (Canada).
EASA. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union.
EASA. (2018). Regulation (EU) No 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union.
Elsayed, E. (2021). Reliability Engineering (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
FAA. (2025a). Aeronautical Information Manual, Chap. 7 Sec. 7. Federal Aviation Administration.
FAA. (2025b). Federal Aviation Regulations, Title 14, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 43 Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration. Federal Aviation Administration.
Hurst, D. (2006, October). 144-31 Operational Availability Modeling for Risk and Impact Analysis. In RTO-MP-AVT-144 Enhanced Aircraft Platform Availability Through Advanced Maintenance Concepts and Technologies.
NATO. (2000). RTO-TR-28 AC/323(AVT)TP/22 Recommended Practices for Monitoring Gas Turbine Engine Life Consumption. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), Research and Technology Organization.
TC. (2025a). Acts and Regulations, Standard 571 – Maintenance – Canadian Aviation Regulations (SOR/96-433). Transport Canada.
TC. (2025b). Aeronautical Information Manual, Sec. 3. Transport Canada.
Wang, C., Puigh, Lei, Guo, Yuan, & Mazarek. (2023, September). Lessons Learned from Aircraft Component Failure Prediction using Full Flight Sensor Data. In 4th Asia Pacific Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.