Enhancing Realistic Remaining Useful Life Prediction using Multi-Fidelity Physic-Informed Neural Network Approach

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2023
Yoojeong Noh Solichin Mochammad Nam Ho Kim

Abstract

The prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) for a component requires a certain failure threshold to be reached. However, using only monitoring data available up to the current time in prognosis can lead to unrealistic RUL predictions. To address this issue, this study proposes a multi-fidelity approach that uses discrepancy predictions to inform a physical model for RUL estimation. Discrepancy predictions are obtained by training the difference between low- and high-fidelity models using a neural network. The low- and high-fidelity models are constructed using the exponential function and monitoring data from experimental work, respectively. As the exponential function has a monotonically increasing trend, a multi-fidelity model can lead to realistic RUL predictions. This proposed method was tested on several failure cases involving rotating components, such as bearings and unbalanced cooling fans. The results show that the proposed method yields realistic and accurate RUL predictions, despite the lack of available monitoring data.

How to Cite

Noh, Y., Mochammad, S., & Kim, N. H. (2023). Enhancing Realistic Remaining Useful Life Prediction using Multi-Fidelity Physic-Informed Neural Network Approach. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2023.v15i1.3474
Abstract 188 | PDF Downloads 151

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Remaining useful life, Multi-fidelity model, Physics-informed neural network, Monotonic increasing function

References
Bu, Hongyan, Song, L., Guo, Z., Li, J. 2022. Selecting scale factor of Bayesian MF surrogate by minimizing posterior variance, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(11), 59-73, ISSN 1000-9361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.012.

Cutajar, K., Pullin, M., Damianou, A. Lawrence, N., González, J. 2019. Deep gaussian processes for MF modeling, Doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.07320.

Guo, M., Manzoni, A., Amendt, M., Conti, P., Hesthaven, J.S. 2022. MF regression using artificial neural networks: Efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantities, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 389, 114378, ISSN 0045-7825, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114378.

Kennedy, M.C., O'Hagan, A. 2001. Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(3), 425-464.

Krishnan, K.V.V., Ganguli, Ranjan. 2021. MF analysis and uncertainty quantification of beam vibration using co-kriging interpolation method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 398, 125987, ISSN 0096-3003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.125987.

Kim, S., Choi, JH., Kim, N.H. 2022. Data-driven prognostics with LF physical information for digital twin: physics-informed neural network. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65, 255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03348-0.

Lee, J., Qiu, H., Yu, G., Lin, J. 2007. Rexnord Technical Services (2007). IMS, University of Cincinnati. "Bearing Data Set", NASA Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/content/prognostics-center-of-excellence-data-set-repository (accessed on 10 January 2023).

Liu, D. Wang, Y. 2019. MF physics-constrained neural network and its application in materials modeling, Journal of Mechanical Design. 141, 12.

Meng, X., Babaee, H. Karniadakis, G.E. 2012. MF Bayesian neural networks: Algorithms and applications, Journal of Computational Physics. 438, 110361.

Meng, X. Karniadakis, G.E. 2019 A composite neural network that learns from MF data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems, Journal of Computational Physics. 401, 1-29.

Motamed, M. 2020. A MF neural network surrogate sampling method for uncertainty quantification. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification. 10 (4), 315–332.

Raissi, M., Karniadakis, G. 2016. Deep MF Gaussian processes, arXiv:1604.07484.

Torzoni, M., Manzoni, A., Mariani, S. 2023. A MF surrogate model for structural health monitoring exploiting model order reduction and artificial neural networks, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 197, 110376, ISSN 0888-3270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110376.
Section
Industry Experience Papers