A Cost-Benefit Approach to Evaluating Engine Health Monitoring Systems

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Grant Gordon Chris Hickenbottom Dinkar Mylaraswamy

Abstract

Condition-based maintenance (CBM) enables fleet-level decisions that increase readiness, increase time between overhaul (TBO) and reduce inspections. Since engines account for a significant portion in overall maintenance cost drivers, detection of incipient faults is an important element of the overall CBM equation. The last few years have seen significant progress in design, development and deployment of engine health monitoring. In order for such potential health monitoring solutions to be operationally viable, they must integrate with existing engine designs and maintenance processes. That is, technical factors must be balanced against economic and operational benefits.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is used to provide a comparison of alternative solutions that decision-makers can use to identify the most cost-effective approach to CBM. In this paper we describe our approach to developing the underlying value capture expressions for monetizing cost and benefits. We illustrate the approach to evaluate two options for mechanical components health monitoring techniques for a gas turbine engine. We conclude the paper with how CBA summary results can be presented to a decision maker.

How to Cite

Gordon, G. ., Hickenbottom, C. ., & Mylaraswamy, . D. . (2012). A Cost-Benefit Approach to Evaluating Engine Health Monitoring Systems. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2012.v4i1.2170
Abstract 20 | PDF Downloads 27596

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Cost Benefit Analysis, Engine Health Monitoring, Bearing Health Monitoring

References
Jaw L.C, Recent advancements in aircraft engine health management (EHM) technologies and recommendations for the next step, in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 1, pp. 683-695, 2005, GT2005-68625.

Katzomis, R. (1998, Feb). Trends in O&S Cost for the AH- 64A. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/man/dod- 101/sys/ac/docs/rkatzomis/sld004.htm.

Mylaraswamy, D., Nwadiogbu, E., and Olson, L., Engine Performance Trending: Practical Insights, Trans Inst of Measurement and Control, 31(3-4), 341-354 (2009).

Parthasarathy, G., Mylaraswamy, D., Uluyol, O., Kim, K., Vohonout, S., Thompson, B., Readiness Approach for Propulsion Engine LRUs, MFPT Annual Conference, 2011.
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. (2010). Report of the OSD CBM+ Action Group 2010 Summer Study (37 pages), October 2010, Washington, D.C.

Uluyol O., Kim K., and Hickenbottom C, A Systematic Approach to Bearing Health Monitoring. Presented at the American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, 2010.

U.S. Army (1996). ADS-51-HDBK, Aeronautical Design Standard Handbook, Rotorcraft and Aircraft Qualification Handbook.

U.S. Army. (2012). ADS-79C-HDBK, Aeronautical Design Standard Handbook for Condition Based Maintenance Systems for US Army Aircraft.U.S. Army. (Version 4.4.0). (2007). Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Model. RDECOM Redstone Arsenal, AL.
Section
Technical Papers