Application of Oil Debris Monitoring For Wind Turbine Gearbox Prognostics and Health Management

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Richard Dupuis

Abstract

Experience has shown that premature gearbox failures are a leading maintenance cost driver that can easily lower the profit margin from a wind turbine operation. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) techniques offer the potential of effectively managing gearbox health problems by detecting early damage, tracking the severity of damage, estimating the time to reach pre-defined damage limits, and providing key information for proactive maintenance decisions. Experience has revealed that major damage modes of wind turbine gearboxes are bearing spall and gear teeth pitting, both of which release metallic debris particles in the oil lubrication system. Oil debris monitoring is thus well suited to provide an early indication and quantification of internal damage to bearings and gears of a wind turbine gearbox.This paper reviews the application of oil debris monitoring as an effective PHM solution for wind turbine gearboxes. The paper describes the principle of operation of the oil debris monitoring technology and the principle of application for effective PHM of wind turbine gearboxes. The paper explains the common surface fatigue damage mode of bearing and gear rolling elements and the characteristics of the destructive debris that result from this damage mode. The paper outlines a simple means of deriving accumulated debris count damage limits based upon basic gearbox component geometry and the use of moving averages for estimating rates of debris generation as a simple yet effective damage data-driven propagation model. Finally, the application of oil debris monitoring as an effective PHM technology for wind turbine gearboxes is illustrated by presenting actual data obtained from seeded fault bearing and gear tests and fielded gearbox applications.

How to Cite

Dupuis, R. (2010). Application of Oil Debris Monitoring For Wind Turbine Gearbox Prognostics and Health Management. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2010.v2i1.1867
Abstract 202 | PDF Downloads 189

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

bearings, condition monitoring, gears, remaining useful life (RUL), oil debris monitoring, wind turbine gearbox

References
Bolander et al, 2009. “Physics-based Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Aircraft Engine Bearing Prognosis” Bolander N., Qiu H., Eklund N., Hindle E., Rosenfeld T. Annual Conference of PHM Society 2009

Dempsey P.J., 2000. “A Comparison of Vibration and Oil Debris Gear Damage Detection Methods Applied to Pitting Damage” Dempsey P.J.NASA/TM-2000- 210371.

Dempsey et al, 2004. “Investigation of Gear and Bearing Fatigue Damage Using Debris Particle Distributions” Dempsey P.J., Lewicki D.G., Decker H.J. NASA/TM-2004-212883.

Forster et al, 2005. “Assessing the Potential of a Commercial Oil Debris Sensor as a Prognostic Device for Gas Turbine Engine Bearings”Forster N.H., Thompson K., Toms A.M., Horning S. AFRL presentation at ISHM conference, August 2005, Cincinnati, OH

Harris, 1991. “Rolling Bearing Analysis 3rd edition” Harris T.A. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1991.

Kitaljevich and Veldhuizen, 2000. “Advanced Oil Debris Montitoring for Pipeline Mechanical Drive Gas Turbines” Kitaljevich D. and Veldhuizen G.J. International Gas Turbine & Aerospace Conference, ASME 2000-GT-347, May 2000.

Kotzalas and Harris, 2001. “Fatigue Failure Progression in Ball Bearings” Kotzalas M.N. and Harris T.A. ASME, Apr 2001.

Kuhnell, 2004. “Wear in Rolling Element Bearings and Gears – How Age and Contamination Affect Them” Kuhnell B.T. Machinery Lubrication Magazine, Sep 2004.

Muir and Howe, 1996. “In-Line Oil Debris Monitor (ODM) for the Advanced Tactical Fighter Engine”, Muir D., Howe B. SAE Paper 961308, 1996

SAE, 2005. “SAE” Aerospace Information Report - Guide to Engine Lubrication System Monitoring” SAE AIR 1828 Rev. B, June 2005.

SKF. “Bearing Failures and their Causes” SKF Product Information 401

Toms and Toms, 2008. “Machinery Oil Analysis – Methods, Automation & Benefits” Toms, Larry A. and Allison M. Toms 3rd Edition, STLE, Park Ridge, IL 2008, ISBN: 978-0-9817512-0-7
Wigglelinkhuizen et al, 2007. “Condition Monitoring for Offshore Wind Farms (CONMOW)”

Wigglelinkhuizen E.J., Rademakers L.W.M.M., Verbruggen T.W., Watson S.J., Xiang J., Giebel G., Norton E.J., Tipluica M.C., Christensen A.J., Becker E. ECN Doc #ECN-E-07-044/CORR0701, June 2007.

Windpower 2005 Nov. “The Role of Bearings in Gearbox Failure”, Windpower Monthly, November 2005.

Windpower, 2009 Jul. “A Shared Anniversary and Shared Ideals”, Andrew Garrard of Garrard Hassan Wind Power Monthly, 25th Anniversary Special, July 2009

Wind Today, 2006 Q3. “Operation, Maintenance, and Safety”, (Impact on Costs, Reliability, and Feedback) Wind Today Third Quarter 2006

Wind Today, 2008 Q1. “Long-Term Operating Costs Post-Warranty”, (Asset Management Can Control Expenses) Wind Today First Quarter 2008

Wright and Neale, 1987. “Wear-debris Analysis as an Integral Component of Machinery Condition Monitoring” Wright G.J. and Neale M.J., Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Aug 1987.
Section
Technical Papers