Data-Driven Anomaly Detection Performance for the Ares I-X Ground Diagnostic Prototype

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Rodney A. Martin Mark A. Schwabacher Bryan L. Matthews

Abstract

In this paper, we will assess the performance of a data-driven anomaly detection algorithm, the In- ductive Monitoring System (IMS), which can be used to detect simulated Thrust Vector Control (TVC) system failures. However, the ability of IMS to detect these failures in a true operational setting may be related to the realistic nature of how they are simulated. As such, we will investi- gate both a low fidelity and high fidelity approach to simulating such failures, with the latter based upon the underlying physics. Furthermore, the ability of IMS to detect anomalies that were pre- viously unknown and not previously simulated will be studied in earnest, as well as apparent de- ficiencies or misapplications that result from us- ing the data-driven paradigm. Our conclusions indicate that robust detection performance of sim- ulated failures using IMS is not appreciably af- fected by the use of a high fidelity simulation. However, we have found that the inclusion of a data-driven algorithm such as IMS into a suite of deployable health management technologies does add significant value.

How to Cite

A. Martin, R., A. Schwabacher , M. ., & L. Matthews, B. (2010). Data-Driven Anomaly Detection Performance for the Ares I-X Ground Diagnostic Prototype. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2010.v2i1.1864
Abstract 17 | PDF Downloads 27

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

anomaly detection, deployed applications, physics of failure, space vehicles, applications: space, data driven methods, Data-driven detection methodologies, simulation

References
(Cavanaugh, 2001) Kevin Cavanaugh. An integrated diagnostics virtual test bench for life cycle support. In Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, volume 7, pages 7–3235–7–3246, Big Sky, Montana, March 2001.

(Chandola et al., 2009) Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee, and Vipin Kumar. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3):1–58, 2009.

(Iverson et al., 2009) David L. Iverson, Rodney Martin, Mark Schwabacher, Lilly Spirkovska, William Taylor, Ryan Mackey, and J. Patrick Castle. General purpose data-driven system monitoring for space operations. In Proceedings of the AIAA In- fotech@Aerospace Conference, Seattle, Washing- ton, April 2009.

(Iverson, 2004) David L. Iverson. Inductive system health monitoring. In Proceedings of The 2004 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI04), Las Vegas, Nevada, June 2004. CSREA Press.

(James and Atkinson, 1990) Mark L. James and David J. Atkinson. Software for development of expert systems. NASA Technology Briefs, 14(6), 1990.

(Mackey et al., 2001) Ryan Mackey, Mark James, Han Park, and Michail Zak. BEAM: Technology for autonomous self-analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, 2001.

(Martin et al., 2010) Rodney Martin, Mark Schwabacher, and Bryan Matthews. Investigation of data-driven anomaly detection performance for simulated thrust vector control system failures. In Proceedings of the 57th Joint Army-Navy-NASA- Air Force Propulsion Meeting, Colorado Springs, CO, May 2010.

(Martin, 2010) Rodney A. Martin. Aerospace Technologies Advancements, chapter Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Capability for Ground-Based Pre-Launch Shuttle Operations, pages 141–164. IN-TECH, January 2010.

(McCool et al., 1980) Alexander A. McCool, Adas J. Verble Jr., and Jack H. Potter. Space transportation system solid rocket booster thrust vector control system. AIAA Journal of Spacecraft, 17(5):407 – 413, Sept. - Oct. 1980.

(Munson et al., 1998) Bruce R. Munson, Donald F. Young, and Theodore H. Okiishi. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. Wiley, 1998.

(Park et al., 2002) Han Park, Ryan Mackey, Mark James, Michail Zak, Michael Zynard, John Sebghati, and William Greene. Analysis of Space Shuttle Main Engine Data Using Beacon-based Exception Analysis for Multi-Missions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, March 2002.

(Pisanich et al., 2006) Greg Pisanich, Ryan Mackey, David Iverson, and Dave Lawrence. Integrated system health management (ISHM) technology demonstration project final report. Technical report, NASA Ames Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Califor- nia Institute of Technology, January 2006.

(Rao et al., 2009) Chinmay Rao, Asok Ray, Soumik Sarkar, and Murat Yasar. Review and comparative evaluation of symbolic dynamic filtering for detection of anomaly patterns. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 3(2):101–114, June 2009.

(Rosset, 2004) Saharon Rosset. Model selection via the AUC. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’04), Banff, Alberta, Canada, July 2004.

(Schwabacher and Waterman, 2008) Mark Schwabacher and Robert Waterman. Pre-launch diagnostics for launch vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, March 2008.

(Schwabacher et al., 2010a) Mark Schwabacher, Rodney Martin, Robert Waterman, Rebecca Oostdyk, John Ossenfort, and Bryan Matthews. Ares I-X ground diagnostic prototype. In Proceedings of the 57th Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force Propulsion Meeting, Colorado Springs, CO, May 2010.

(Schwabacher et al., 2010b) Mark Schwabacher, Rodney Martin, Robert Waterman, Rebecca Oostdyk, John Ossenfort, and Bryan Matthews. Ares I-X ground diagnostic prototype. In AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference. AIAA, April 2010.

(Tchouvelev et al., 2007) Andrei V. Tchouvelev, Zhong Cheng, Vladimir M. Agranat, and Ser- guei V. Zhubrin. Effectiveness of small barriers as means to reduce clearance distances. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32:1409 – 1415, 2007.
Section
Technical Papers