Explainable Prognostics Method through Differential Evolved RVR Ensemble of Relevance Vector Machines
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Operating experience from various mechanical components indicates that their operating performance depends on non-well known physical mechanisms, while it is likely that various unexpected factors will act as catalysts for reaching the failure point. Therefore, one way to overcome the partially knowledge of physical mechanisms is the use of data-driven methods that estimate the degradation patterns and predict the failure point. Thus, there is a growing need to design and develop new and more sophisticated prognostic technologies that can estimate the remaining useful life of a mechanical component. In this work, a new method for prognostics is proposed that not only provides a prediction over the failure point but also provides an explanation over the rationale behind that prediction. The proposed method utilized tools from artificial intelligence and more specifically relevance vector machines (RVM) and differential evolution (DE). The cornerstone of the method is the assembly of an ensemble comprised of multiple RVM equipped with different kernels, and the subsequent evolution of the ensemble using the differential evolution. DE will provide a set of values for the coefficients of the ensemble. Then based on the coefficients together with their associated RVMs are used to provide an explanation over the prediction. The explanation stems from the kernels themselves as each kernel models different set of properties. The presented method is tested on a set of real-world degradation data taken from a Gas Turbine (GT) propulsion plant.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
RVR, Explainable AI, Differential Evolution, Ensemble Learning
Resilient and Efficient Energy Industry. OnePetro.
Alamaniotis, M., Bargiotas, D., Bourbakis, N. G., & Tsoukalas, L. H. (2015). Genetic optimal regression of relevance vector machines for electricity pricing signal forecasting in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(6), pp. 2997-3005.
Alamaniotis, M., Ikonomopoulos, A., & Tsoukalas, L. H. (2012). Probabilistic kernel approach to online monitoring of nuclear power plants. Nuclear Technology, 177(1), pp. 132-145.
Alamaniotis, M. and Cappelli, M., (2018). Intelligent identification of boiling water reactor state utilizing relevance vector regression models. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, 4(2).
Alamaniotis, M., Grelle, A., & Tsoukalas, L. H. (2014). Regression to fuzziness method for estimation of
remaining useful life in power plant components. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 48(1-2), 188-198.
Baptista, M., Prendinger, H., & Henriques, E. (2020). Prognostics in aeronautics with deep recurrent neural networks. In PHM Society European Conference (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 11-11).
Coble, J., & Hines, J. W. (2009). Identifying optimal prognostic parameters from data: a genetic algorithms approach. In Annual Conference of the PHM Society (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Coble, J., Ramuhalli, P., Bond, L., Hines, J. and Ipadhyaya, B., (2015). A review of prognostics and health management applications in nuclear power plants. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 6(3), pp. 1-22.
Elattar, H. M., Elminir, H. K., & Riad, A. M. (2016). Prognostics: a literature review. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2(2), pp. 125-154.
Hines, W.J., & Usynin, A. (2008). Current computational trends in equipment prognostics. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 1(1), 94-102.
Li, H., Pan, D., & Chen, C. P. (2014). Intelligent prognostics for battery health monitoring using the mean entropy and
relevance vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(7), pp. 851- 862.
Liu, C., Zhang, L., Niu, J., Yao, R., & Wu, C. (2020). Intelligent prognostics of machining tools based on adaptive variational mode decomposition and deep learning method with attention mechanism. Neurocomputing, 417, pp. 239-254.
Meng, H., & Li, Y. F. (2019). A review on prognostics and health management (PHM) methods of lithium-ion batteries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116, pp. 109405.
Nguyen, D. V., Kefalas, M., Yang, K., Apostolidis, A., Olhofer, M., Limmer, S., & Bäck, T. H. W. (2019). A review: Prognostics and health management in automotive and aerospace. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 10(2), pp. 1-35.
Nor, A. K. M., Pedapati, S. R., Muhammad, M., & Leiva, V. (2021). Overview of explainable artificial intelligence for prognostic and health management of industrial assets based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Sensors, 21(23), pp. 8020.
Opara, K. R., & Arabas, J. (2019). Differential Evolution: A survey of theoretical analyses. Swarm and evolutionary
computation, 44, 546-558.
Raouf, I., Khan, A., Khalid, S., Sohail, M., Azad, M. M., & Kim, H. S. (2022). Sensor-Based Prognostic Health
Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey. Mathematics, 10(18), pp. 3233.
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning (Vol. 1, p. 159).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rescher, N., (1998). Predicting the future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. SUNY Press.
Sankararaman, S., & Goebel, K. (2015). Uncertainty in prognostics and systems health management. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 6(4), pp. 777-780.
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization
over continuous spaces. Journal of global optimization, 11(4), pp. 341.
Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Gao, R. X., & Kumara, S. (2017). A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: tool wear prediction using random forests. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(7)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.