Active Mission Success Estimation through PHM-Informed Probabilistic Modelling
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) techniques have traditionally been used to analyze electrical and mechanical systems, but similar techniques can be adapted for less mechatronically-focused processes such as crewed space missions. By applying failure analysis techniques taken from PHM, the probability of success for missions can be calculated. Extensive work has been conducted to predict space mission failure, but many existing methods do not take full advantage of modern computing power and the potential for real-time calculation of mission failure probabilities. The Active Mission Success Estimation (AMSE) method is developed in this paper to track and calculate the probability of mission failure as the mission progresses, and is intentionally adaptable for shifting mission objectives and parameters. This form of mission modelling takes a broader view of the mission and objectives, and develops statistical probability models of success or failure for multiple possible choice combinations that is used to inform real-time decisions and maximize probability of mission success. A case study of a generalized crewed Mars mission that has turned into a survival scenario is considered where an astronaut has been left behind on the surface and must survive for an extended period of time before undertaking a long-distance journey to a new launch site for rescue and return to Earth. The AMSE method presented here aims to establish real-time probabilistic modeling of decision outcomes during an active mission and can be used to inform mission decisions.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
applications: space, model design space exploration, assessment, mission planning
Balaban, E., Narasimhan, S., Daigle, M., Roychoudhury, I., Sweet, A., Bond, C., and Gorospe, G.. 2013. “Development of a Mobile Robot Test Platform and Methods for Validation of Prognostics-Enabled Decision Making Algorithms.” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management 4 (1).
Blanchard, B. S., and Fabrycky, W. J.. 1990. Systems Engineering and Analysis. Vol. 4. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. http://sutlib2.sut.ac.th/sut_contents/H104135.pdf.
Böhm, C., and Jacopini, G.. 1966. “Flow Diagrams, Turing Machines and Languages with Only Two Formation Rules.” Communications of the ACM 9 (5): 366–71.
Boyle, R. M., Rodriggs, L., Allton, C., Jennings, M., and Aitchison, L.. 2012. “Suitport Feasibility-Human Pressurized Space Suit Donning Tests with the Marman Clamp and Pneumatic Flipper Suitport Concepts.” http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2013-3399.
Cantor, B. A. 2007. “Present-Day Martian Weather-5 Mars Years of Observations by MGS-MOC and MRO- MARCI.” LPI Contributions 1353: 3063.
Cantor, B. , Malin, M., and Edgett, K.S.. 2002. “Multiyear Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) Observations of Repeated Martian Weather Phenomena during the Northern Summer Season.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets (1991–2012) 107 (E3): 3–1.
Daines, G. 2015. “NASA’s Journey to Mars.” Text. NASA. February 13. http://www.nasa.gov/content/nasas- journey-to-mars.
Van Bossuyt, D.L., O'Halloran, B.. 2015. “Modeling of Function Failure Propagation Across Uncoupled Systems.”
Van Bossuyt, D.L., Dong, A. 2013. “On Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes.” Journal of Mechanical Design 135 (12). doi:10.1115/1.4025118.
Van Bossuyt, D.L., Hoyle, C. 2012. “Risk Attitudes in Risk- Based Design: Considering Risk Attitude Using Utility Theory in Risk-Based Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 26 (04). doi:10.1017/S0890060412000261.
Goddard, R.H. 1920. “A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes.” Nature 105 (August): 809–11. doi:10.1038/105809a0.
Kurtoglu, T., Tumer, I.Y., and Jensen, D.C.. 2010. “A Functional Failure Reasoning Methodology for Evaluation of Conceptual System Architectures.” Research in Engineering Design 21 (4): 209–34.
Lakdawalla, E. 2015. “Curiosity Wheel Damage: The Problem and Solutions.” Accessed May 4. http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily- lakdawalla/2014/08190630-curiosity-wheel- damage.html.
Mahaffy, P.R., Webster, C.R., Atreya, S.K., Franz, H., Wong, M., Conrad, P.G., Harpold, D., et al. 2013. “Abundance and Isotopic Composition of Gases in the Martian Atmosphere from the Curiosity Rover.” Science 341 (6143): 263–66. doi:10.1126/science.1237966.
“Mars One.” 2015. Accessed May 29. http://www.mars- one.com/.
Marty, J. C., Balmino, G., Duron, J., Rosenblatt, P., Le Maistre, S., Rivoldini, A., Dehant, V., and Van Hoolst, V. 2009. “Martian Gravity Field Model and Its Time Variations from MGS and Odyssey Data.” Planetary and Space Science 57 (3): 350–63.
Modarres, M., Kaminskiy, M., and Krivtsov, V. 2011.Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: APractical Guide. CRC press.
Mohaghegh, Z., Kazemi, R., and Mosleh, A. 2009.“Incorporating Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of Complex Socio-Technical Systems: A Hybrid Technique Formalization.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 (5): 1000–1018.
NASA.org. 2015. “NASA - Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle.” Accessed May 29. http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/technology/space _exploration_vehicle/index.html.
Nassif, S.R., Strojwas, A.J., and Director, S.W. 1986. “A Methodology for Worst-Case Analysis of Integrated Circuits.” Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on 5 (1): 104–13.
O’Halloran, B.M., Papakonstantinou, N., and Van Bossuyt, D.L. 2015. “Modeling of Function Failure Propagation across Uncoupled Systems.” In Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2015 Annual, 1–6. IEEE.
Short, A.R., and Van Bossuyt, D.L. 2015a. “Risk Attitude Informed Route Planning in a Simulated Planetary Rover.” In Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Boston.
Short, A.R., and Van Bossuyt, D.L. 2015b. “Prognostics Informed Damage Aversion Algorithms in a Simulated Planetary Rover.” In CURRENTLY IN REVIEW.
Short, A.R., and Van Bossuyt, D.L. 2015c. “Rerouting Failure Flows Using Logic Blocks in Functional Models for Improved System Robustness: Failure Flow Decision Functions.” In International Conference on Engineering Design 2015.
Sneider, J. 2015. “Drew Goddard in Negotiations to Write and Direct ‘The Martian’ for Fox (Exclusive).” TheWrap. Accessed May 29. http://www.thewrap.com/drew-goddard- negotiations-write-direct-martian-fox-exclusive- 91896/.
Stone, R.B., and Wood, K.L. 2000. “Development of a Functional Basis for Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 122 (4): 359–70.
Sweet, A., Gorospe, G., Daigle, M., Celaya, J.R., Balaban, E., Roychoudhury, I., and Narasimhan, S. 2014. “Demonstration of Prognostics-Enabled Decision Making Algorithms on a Hardware Mobile Robot Test Platform.” Accessed October 15. http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/fil es/phm_submission/2014/phmc_14_018.pdf.
Van Bossuyt, D.L., Tumer, I.Y., and Wall, S.D. 2013. “A Case for Trading Risk in Complex Conceptual Design Trade Studies.” Research in Engineering Design 24 (3): 259–75.
Weir, A. 2011. The Martian. Crown Publishing Group. Wertz, J.R., Everett D.F., and Puschell, J.J. 2011a. “Risk and Reliability.” In Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD. Microcosm Press.
Wertz, J.R., and Everet D.F. 2011b. Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD. Microcosm Press. Ye, Y. 1997. “Worst-Case Analysis.” Interior Point Algorithms: Theory and Analysis, 147–77.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.