A Fusion Method Based on Unscented Particle Filter and Minimum Sampling Variance Resampling for Lithium-ion Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 3, 2016
Jiayu Chen Dong Zhou Chuan Lu

Abstract

It is important to predict the capacity of lithium-ion battery for future cycles to assess its health condition and to estimate remaining useful life (RUL). Particle filter approaches are widely applied into the estimation of battery capacity. However, after several iterations, the degeneracy and impoverishment of particles can cause unreliable and inaccurate prediction results in particle filter (PF). In this paper, a fusion method is proposed by integrating unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and minimum sampling variance resampling (MSVR) into the standard PF for RUL prediction of batteries. The UKF is employed to generate the proposal distribution of particles, which is used by PF to calculate the weights of particles. Next, the MSVR algorithm is introduced for performing resampling procedure to improve the performance. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is validated and compared to other predictors with four different battery datasets from NASA. According to the results, the integrated method has high reliability and prediction accuracy.

How to Cite

Chen, J., Zhou, D., & Lu, C. (2016). A Fusion Method Based on Unscented Particle Filter and Minimum Sampling Variance Resampling for Lithium-ion Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2016.v8i1.2553
Abstract 117 | PDF Downloads 125

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

battery remaining useful life prediction, unscented particle filter, resampling

References
Andre D, Appel C, Soczka-Guth T, Sauer DU. (2013). Advanced mathematical methods of SOC and SOH estimation for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of power sources;vol. 224, pp. 20-7.
Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on;vol. 50(2), pp. 174-88.
Dong H, Jin X, Lou Y, Wang C. (2014). Lithium-ion battery state of health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction based on support vector regression-particle filter. Journal of Power Sources;vol. 271, pp. 114-23.
Gregory LP. (2004). Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 1. Background. Journal of Power Sources;vol. 134(2), pp. 252-61.
He W, Williard N, Chen C, Pecht M. (2014). State of charge estimation for Li-ion batteries using neural network modeling and unscented Kalman filter-based error cancellation. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems;vol. 62, pp. 783-91.
He W, Williard N, Osterman M, Pecht M. (2011). Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster–Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Journal of Power Sources;vol. 196(23), pp. 10314-21.
Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK, editors. (Year), New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. AeroSense'97. 1997: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Li TC, Villarrubia G, Sun SD, Corchado JM, Bajo J. (2015). Resampling methods for particle filtering: identical distribution, a new method, and comparable study. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering;vol. 16(11), pp. 969-84.
Miao Q, Xie L, Cui H, Liang W, Pecht M. (2013). Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery with unscented particle filter technique. Microelectronics Reliability;vol. 53(6), pp. 805-10.
Nuhic A, Terzimehic T, Soczka-Guth T, Buchholz M, Dietmayer K. (2013). Health diagnosis and remaining useful life prognostics of lithium-ion batteries using data-driven methods. Journal of Power Sources;vol. 239, pp. 680-8.
Plett GL. (2004). Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 2. Modeling and identification. Journal of power sources;vol. 134(2), pp. 262-76.
Plett GL. (2004). Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 3. State and parameter estimation. Journal of Power sources;vol. 134(2), pp. 277-92.
Saha B, Goebel K. (2007). Battery data set. NASA AMES prognostics data repository;vol., pp.
Saha B, Goebel K, editors. (Year), Modeling Li-ion battery capacity depletion in a particle filtering framework. Proceedings of the annual conference of the prognostics and health management society. 2009.
Saha B, Goebel K, Poll S, Christophersen J. (2009). Prognostics methods for battery health monitoring using a Bayesian framework. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on;vol. 58(2), pp. 291-6.
Sorenson HW, Alspach DL. (1971). Recursive Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sums. Automatica;vol. 7(4), pp. 465-79.
Walker E, Rayman S, White RE. (2015). Comparison of a particle filter and other state estimation methods for prognostics of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources;vol. 287, pp. 1-12.
Widodo A, Shim M-C, Caesarendra W, Yang B-S. (2011). Intelligent prognostics for battery health monitoring based on sample entropy. Expert Systems with Applications;vol. 38(9), pp. 11763-9.
Xing Y, Ma EW, Tsui K-L, Pecht M. (2013). An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries. Microelectronics Reliability;vol. 53(6), pp. 811-20.
Xing Y, Ma EW, Tsui KL, Pecht M. (2011). Battery management systems in electric and hybrid vehicles. Energies;vol. 4(11), pp. 1840-57.
Zheng X, Fang H. (2015). An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety;vol. 144, pp. 74-82.
Section
Technical Research Papers