Wind Turbine Intelligent Gear Fault Identification

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 2, 2017
Sofia Koukoura James Carroll Alasdair McDonald

Abstract

This paper aims to present the development of a framework for monitoring of wind turbine gearboxes and prognosis of gear fracture faults, using vibration data and machine learning techniques. The proposed methodology analyses gear vibration signals in the order domain, using a shaft tachometer pulse. Indicators that represent the health state of the gear are algorithmically extracted. Those indicators are used as features to train diagnostic models that predict the health status of the gear. The efficacy of the proposed methodology is demonstrated with a case study using real wind turbine vibration data. Data is collected for a wind turbine at various time steps prior to failure and according to the maintenance reports
there is enough data to form a healthy baseline. The data is classified according to the time before failure that the signal was collected.The learning algorithms used are discussed and their results are compared. The case study results indicate that this data driven model can lay the groundwork for a robust framework for the early detection of emerging gear tooth fracture faults. This can lead to minimisation of wind turbine downtime and revenue increase.

How to Cite

Koukoura, S., Carroll, J., & McDonald, A. (2017). Wind Turbine Intelligent Gear Fault Identification. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2017.v9i1.2427
Abstract 261 | PDF Downloads 573

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

fault diagnosis, Wind turbines, Pattern recognition

References
Banjevic, D., Jardine, A., Makis, V., & Ennis, M. (2001). A control-limit policy and software for condition-based maintenance optimization. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 39(1), 32–50.
Barszcz, T., & Randall, R. B. (2009). Application of spectral kurtosis for detection of a tooth crack in the planetary gear of a wind turbine. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 23(4), 1352–1365.
Byon, E., Pérez, E., Ding, Y., & Ntaimo, L. (2011). Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance using discrete event system specification. Simulation, 87(12), 1093–1117.
Carroll, J., McDonald, A., & McMillan, D. (2015). Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled o&m cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy.
Crabtree, C. J., Zappalá, D., & Hogg, S. I. (2015). Wind energy: Uk experiences and offshore operational challenges. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 229(7), 727–746.
Fyfe, K., & Munck, E. (1997). Analysis of computed order tracking. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 11(2), 187–205.
Gebraeel, N. Z., Lawley, M. A., Li, R., & Ryan, J. K. (2005). Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: A bayesian approach. IiE Transactions, 37(6), 543–557.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
Hanna, J., Hatch, C., Kalb, M., Weiss, A., & Luo, H. (2011). Detection of wind turbine gear tooth defects using sideband energy ratio. China Wind Power 2011; October, 19-21, 2011, Beijing, China.
Kacprzynski, G. J., Roemer, M. J., Modgil, G., Palladino, A., & Maynard, K. (2002). Enhancement of physics-offailure prognostic models with system level features. In Aerospace conference proceedings, 2002. ieee (Vol. 6, pp. 6–6).
Leahy, K., Hu, R. L., Konstantakopoulos, I. C., Spanos, C. J., & Agogino, A. M. (2016). Diagnosing wind turbine faults using machine learning techniques applied to operational data. In Prognostics and health management (icphm), 2016 ieee international conference on (pp. 1–8).
Li, C. J., & Lee, H. (2005). Gear fatigue crack prognosis using embedded model, gear dynamic model and fracture mechanics. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 19(4), 836–846.
Lu, W., & Chu, F. (2010). Condition monitoring and fault diagnostics of wind turbines. In Prognostics and health management conference, 2010. phm’10. (pp. 1–11).
Marble, S., & Morton, B. P. (2006). Predicting the remaining life of propulsion system bearings. In Aerospace conference, 2006 ieee (pp. 8–pp).
McFadden, P. (1986). Detecting fatigue cracks in gears by amplitude and phase demodulation of the meshing vibration. Journal of vibration, acoustics, stress, and reliability in design, 108(2), 165–170.
Nielsen, J. J., & Sørensen, J. D. (2011). On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(1), 218–229.
Randall, R. B. (2011). Vibration-based condition monitoring: industrial, aerospace and automotive applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Santos, P., Villa, L. F., Reñones, A., Bustillo, A., & Maudes, J. (2015). An svm-based solution for fault detection in wind turbines. Sensors, 15(3), 5627–5648.
Sheng, S. (2012). Wind turbine gearbox condition monitoring round robin study–vibration analysis. Contract, 303, 275–3000.
Teng, W., Wang, F., Zhang, K., Liu, Y., & Ding, X. (2014). Pitting fault detection of a wind turbine gearbox using empirical mode decomposition. Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 60(1), 12–20.
Tian, Z. (2012). An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(2), 227–237.
Tian, Z., Jin, T., Wu, B., & Ding, F. (2011). Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring. Renewable Energy, 36(5), 1502–1509.
Tian, Z., Wong, L., & Safaei, N. (2010). A neural network approach for remaining useful life prediction utilizing both failure and suspension histories. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1542–1555.
Verbert, K., De Schutter, B., & Babuška, R. (2017). Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 159, 310–321.
Section
Technical Research Papers