Multiple Fault Diagnostic Strategy for Redundant System

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 25, 2011
Yang Peng Qiu Jing Liu Guan-jun Lv Ke-hong

Abstract

It is difficult to diagnose the faults, especially multiple faults, in redundant systems by traditional diagnostic strategies. So the problem of multiple fault diagnostic strategy for redundant system was researched in this paper. Firstly, the typical characters of multiple faults (minimal faults) were analyzed, and the problem was formulated. Secondly, a pair of two-tuples were applied to denote the possible and impossible diagnostic conclusion at different diagnostic stages respectively, and a multiple fault diagnostic inference engine was constructed based on Boolean logic. The inference engine can determine the system diagnostic conclusions after executing each test, and determine whether a repair action was needed, and further determine whether a next test was needed. Thirdly, a method determining the next best test was presented. Based on the proposed inference engine and test determining method, a multiple fault diagnostic strategy was constructed. Finally, a simulation case and a certain flight control system were applied to illustrate the proposed diagnostic strategy. The simulation and practical data computational results show that the presented diagnostic strategy can diagnose multiple faults in redundant systems effectively and it is of certain application value.

How to Cite

Peng , Y. ., Jing, Q., Guan-jun, L. ., & Ke-hong, L. . (2011). Multiple Fault Diagnostic Strategy for Redundant System. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2011.v3i1.1980
Abstract 117 | PDF Downloads 150

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

PHM

References
[1] Simpson W R, Sheppard J W. Multiple Failure Diagnosis[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Autotestcon, 1994:381-389.
[2] Davis R. Retrospective on diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1993,59: 149-157.
[3] Tu F, Pattipati K R, Deb S, et al. Computationally efficient algorithms for multiple fault diagnosis in large graph-based systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003 33(1):73-85.
[4] Long Bing, Jiang Xing-wei, Song Zheng-ji. Study on multiple fault diagnostic technique for aerospace craft based on multi-signal model[J]. Journal of astronavigation, 2004, 25(5):591-594.[in chinese]
[5] Stefano Chessa, Paolo Santi. Operative Diagnosis of Graph-Based Systems with Multiple Faults.[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2001, 31(2):112-119.
[6] Kleer J D. Diagnosing Multiple Faults. Artificial Intelligence. 1987, 32:97-130.
[7] Shakeri M, Raghavan V, Pattipati K, et al. Sequential testing algorithms for multiple fault isolation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2000, 30(1):1-14.
[8] Shakeri M, Pattipati K R, Raghavan V, et al. Optimal and Near-Optimal Algorithms for Multiple Fault Diagnosis with Unreliable Tests [J]. IEEE trans on SMC,1998:431-440.
[9] Doyle S A, Dugan J B, Patterson-Hine A. A quantitative analysis of the F18 flight control system[C]. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Computing in Aerospace 9 Conference proceedings, 1993:668-675.
Section
Poster Presentations