New prognostics-based structural maintenance strategies for civil aircraft

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 14, 2017
Christian Gogu

Abstract

Currently, structural maintenance of civil aircraft is based on the scheduled maintenance strategy, where all the aircraft of a same model are inspected according to a predetermined schedule. Embedding sensors in aeronautical structures allowing to monitor their structural health can also open up new strategies for more efficient maintenance planning. A first possibility is to move from scheduled maintenance to condition based maintenance, where the current condition of the aircraft triggers specific maintenance policies. A further step is to not only use the current state of the damage but to also predict future damage growth and determine the maintenance policy accordingly. Both condition based as well as prognostics based strategies can be carried out independently or can be coordinated with other, scheduled, non-structural maintenances, which leads to a total of four new possible maintenance strategies. An application of these maintenance strategies to fuselage panels of a short range commercial aircraft is presented and their effectiveness and cost-efficiency is compared between them and with that of traditional scheduled maintenance. We show that large savings can be achieved, particularly when large variabilities are present.

Abstract 69 | PDF Downloads 73

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

PHM

References
Beral, B., Speckman, H., Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) for Aircraft Structures: A Challenge for System Developers and Aircraft Manufacturers”, Structural Health Monitoring, DEStech Publications, 2003.
Boller, C., Meyendorf, N., “State-of-the-Art in Structural Health Monitoring for Aeronautics”, Proc. of International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Fürth, Germany, December 3-5, 2008. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Certification specifications, Part 25, Airworthiness Code: Large Aeroplanes, Sec. 25.571, Damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure.
Kale. A., Haftka, R.T., “Tradeoff of Weight and Inspection Cost in Reliability-Based Structural Optimization”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2008.
Lopez, I., Sarigul-Klijn, N., “A review of uncertainty in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring, diagnosis and control: Challenges and opportunities”, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 46, 2010, pp. 247-273.
Pattabhiraman, S., Gogu, C., Kim, N.H., Haftka, R.T., & Bes, C., “Skipping unnecessary structural airframe maintenance using an onboard structural health monitoring system”, Journal of Risk and Reliability, 226(5), 549-560, 2012.
Wang, Y., “Development of predictive structural maintenance strategies for aircraft using model-based prognostics”, PhD dissertation, Université de Toulouse, 2017
Wang, Y., Gogu, C., Binaud, N., Bes, C., Haftka, R. T., & Kim, N.H. A cost driven predictive maintenance policy for structural airframe maintenance. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.02.005 , 2017
Section
Invited Papers